Busy weekend…

As if by magic, as England get booted out of the World Cup and the country basks in a heatwave, all sorts of New Labour unpleasantness has bubbled to the surface once more, the stench cunningly hidden by the reek of booze-addled mourners. (Note to Blair: Beckham resigned as Captain in a timely manner in order to enable his successor plenty of time to settle into the job before the next major tournament… Hint hint…)

So, this weekend has seen rumours of another 1,000 troops being sent to Afghanistan, where “we face defeat” – just the most prominent of a vast array of stories which would tend to suggest (as if we didn’t know already) that the government is staggering around grasping for a purpose like a Blunkett without his dog.

So, why has the Home Office suspended all research projects? Dsquared was on the case, ready to trawl through the dross with an army of volunteers, but “Research Thursday” was cancelled without fanfare or prior warning.

“A spokesman said: ‘There’s a pause while we reaffirm what the department’s main objectives are. Research has got to feed into policy and we want to do research into high-priority areas.’”

These high priority areas are, it would appear, likely to include finding ways of removing protection from government whistleblowers, providing further justification for again rejecting calls for a proper inquiry into the 7/7 attacks, changing public perceptions that Blair has failed on crime (note to the Home Office – it’s easier to be “tough on the causes of crime” if you, erm, actually do some research into what those causese might be), changing businesses’ perception that the government will always sacrifice their interests to those of the United States, finding ways to overturn the centuries-old right to trial, getting over yet another defeat in the Labour heartland, hiding the ridiculousness of the utterly barmy (yet strangely sinister) protest exclusion zone, finding excuses for deportation tactics so harsh that even former Home Secretary Jack Straw thinks they’re a bit off, and coming up with yet more excuses for holding any and all of us for 90 days without trial, courtesy of Gordon Brown.

Expect more anti-terror nonsense throughout this week in the run-up to the anniversary of the 7th July attacks on Friday, as Gordon tries to show us how tough he is and the rest of the government continue to try and make excuses for the utter lack of any progress in protecting us from swivel-eyed maniacs with bombs.

What, you don’t seriously think you’re any safer now than you were this time last year, do you? Of course you aren’t. It is still just as easy to smuggle a load of bombs onto the underground, a bridge, a bus, a train etc. etc. etc. as it was on the 7th or 21st July 2005.

Because no matter how many draconian, high-profile measures they put in place supposedly to prevent another attack, no matter how many armed police they put on the streets, no matter how many people they lock up just in case, preventing another attack is impossible. Just look at Israel.

DANGER: tediously overwrought political footballing metaphor approaching*

As if the team’s performances on the pitch weren’t boringly average enough, we now get our two options for next Prime Minister acting like primary school kids fighting over who had the “best” seat at the football. “Best” here meaning “most like ordinary people”, apparently.

As such, by Labour’s definition, “ordinary” is being given a ticket to a world cup match by the government of the host country – the Tories think it’s flying by private jet to take up a ticket donated by the company broadcasting the match in the UK.

(Note to Brown and Cameron – grow up and get on with your jobs, you infantile morons.)

Both Brown and Cameron are somewhat like the current England team, come to think of it – their hardcore supporters think they’ve got a real chance but everyone else knows they’re lucky to have got as far as they have; they show occasional flashes of brilliance, more often brief spells of mere competence, yet you always have a sneak feeling that when they do well it’s only a fluke; and they’re both not only really rather dull but also lack the ability to inspire enthusiasm from those not already converted to the cause.

(Note to the England team – please get knocked out by Ecuador and save us from further bromidic, pedestrian, somniferous performances.)

* sod it, everyone else is doing it – something to do with this World Cup business, I suppose…

More Gordon Brown subtlety

From today’s Metro freebie:

Chancellor goes on a power tripGordon Brown plunged a car into a stunt pool yesterday and joked: “A great sense of power – you don’t get that as Chancellor.” Mr Brown made the crack as he opened a new underwater film stage at Pinewood Studios, near Slough. He was shown the £1.5 million set-up used to film The Da Vinci Code. The 6m (20ft) deep pool will be used for stunts in the new Bond film, Casino Royale.

Oh no, he’s not getting increasingly desperate to become Prime Minister, is he?

Brown, not bitter…

Missed this – interesting interview with Gordon Brown in last Sunday’s Washington Post. Some edited highlights:

Many in the Labor Party say Blair should announce a date to leave office. Your response?We have just had very difficult elections. People want to look at how the Labor Party can best prepare for the future. Tony Blair has said he does not wish to stand at the next election and that he wants to organize a stable and orderly transition.

Are you satisfied with the way Blair is handling the transition?

You’ve got term limits in the U.S. We have no term limits. It’s a matter for him and the Labor Party. It’s not really a matter for me at all.

What’s the next step for you? It sounds like there is a lot of pressure for the prime minister to set a date to go.

He has said he wants a stable and orderly transition, and people from the party are asking him: What does that mean?

Some say Blair is setting up a candidate against you.

These things are said. I’ve just got to get on with my job. I think things will work themselves out.

But you want to be prime minister, right?

I’ve been in this job long enough to know, first of all, that it’s what you do rather than which position you hold that matters. And equally, that you don’t tempt fate by making rash announcements.

It’s getting fairly tricky to avoid tripping over all these hints Brown keeps dropping… When is the move going to be made, and who – considering Brown is desperate to keep his hands clean and avoid Heseltine’s fate – is he going to get to make it for him?

Blair as bad as Thatcher

As an opinion poll shows Blair’s Labour party to be as unpopular as Thatcher’s Tories in late 1981 (following mass unemployment and tax rises during a recession, giving Thatcher personal approval ratings of just 23%, 11 points lower than even Blair’s currently stand), Gordon ups the ante, announcing that Blair will hold talks about a handover. Has Blair actually agreed to this, or is Brown using the same tactics that Charles Clarke tried, following the advice of Yes, Minister? In politics, if you announce something to the press, it becomes true…Where else but UK Polling Report for more? (Actually, Political Betting, now you come to mention it – and again on the bad news for Gordon from the poll.)

“Tony Brown”

Bill Clinton being interviewed on Newsnight just now, talking about the Labour leadership, made the wonderful Freudian slip of referring to “Tony Brown”…

Well I found it funny. (And at this juncture I will point out that the only reason I’m not in the pub is because the local’s closed for refurbishment…)

Possible career move for Gordon Brown?

Heh – via a friendly French reader, Le Monde ponders why, as Gordon may have to wait a while longer to become Prime Minister, doesn’t he go off and save France, Germany and Italy from their disastrous heads of state in the mean time? (Very rapid translation):

“The chancellor is the only person able finally to give Germany the macroeconomic policy which it needs, the only person who can finally bring to France a governmental line which is not solely dictated by the preoccupation with ‘communication’, and the only person capable of formulating a vision for Italy which is not short-term. Mr. Brown, last but not least, could, as a single Prime Minister for the three countries, coordinate their economic policies which are today far too separate, too national and uncooperative…

“England has two great talented politicians that may be part of the solution [to our problems] : Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. That’s one too many. Rather than letting them fighting each other, it would be better for Her Majesty to lend us one. The only problem with the Scotsman Brown is that he never smiles. He’s not funny. Good. That would make a change from our jokers.”

Could this be an option now that there are increasing numbers of column inches devoted to slagging off and doubting our Chancellor’s abilities? Heh…