<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine years ago&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/2009/11/nine-years-ago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/2009/11/nine-years-ago/</link>
	<description>In search of a European identity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/2009/11/nine-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-66391</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/?p=2447#comment-66391</guid>
		<description>Once another stage of reforms roll into motion, today&#039;s Lisbon treaty opponents are tomorrow&#039;s defenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once another stage of reforms roll into motion, today&#8217;s Lisbon treaty opponents are tomorrow&#8217;s defenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Grahn</title>
		<link>http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/2009/11/nine-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-66338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Grahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/?p=2447#comment-66338</guid>
		<description>Nosemonkey, 

Even if the Lisbon Treaty lost some compared to the Constitutional Treaty, the amended Treaty on European Union is a fairly clear outline of what the EU is about, as far as you can say that of any legal texts. (Britain did some damage to the clarity by insisting on putting the foreign, security and defence policy Articles into the TEU, though, instead of with the rest of external relations in the TFEU.) 

But naturally the policies and activities of the European Union are much more than the improved basic legal texts. 

I just wonder how anyone can explain the working of the EU in a country where the most sold newspapers routinely report news (not comment even) in terms like &quot;the hated EU treaty&quot; etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nosemonkey, </p>
<p>Even if the Lisbon Treaty lost some compared to the Constitutional Treaty, the amended Treaty on European Union is a fairly clear outline of what the EU is about, as far as you can say that of any legal texts. (Britain did some damage to the clarity by insisting on putting the foreign, security and defence policy Articles into the TEU, though, instead of with the rest of external relations in the TFEU.) </p>
<p>But naturally the policies and activities of the European Union are much more than the improved basic legal texts. </p>
<p>I just wonder how anyone can explain the working of the EU in a country where the most sold newspapers routinely report news (not comment even) in terms like &#8220;the hated EU treaty&#8221; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
